atOptions = { 'key' : '1d688eecd47db3b7b074e38dabfd19e3', 'format' : 'iframe', 'height' : 600, 'width' : 160, 'params' : {} }; Skip to main content

Casetify

Beyond Material Comfort: A Community-Centric Housing Model (Collines) to Address Loneliness Among Financially Secure Older and Single Adults

  Beyond Material Comfort: A Community-Centric Housing Model (Coll ines) to Address Loneliness Among Financially Secure Older and Single Adults Abstract Material prosperity does not guarantee emotional well-being. A growing segment of financially secure middle-class individuals—particularly those aged 55 and above, parents with children settled abroad, and unmarried adults—experience chronic loneliness, weakened social bonds, and declining psychological health. This paradox reflects a structural transformation in family systems, urban housing design, and migration patterns rather than an economic deficiency. This paper develops a structured socio-economic and psychological analysis of loneliness among financially stable populations and proposes an innovative housing framework — the Colinese One-Room Community Living Model . The model integrates private micro-units with structured shared facilities to foster companionship, security, affordability, and purposeful engagement. The pape...

Sunscreen Showdown: Ghazal Alagh Accuses Lakmé of Product Imitation, Ignites Industry Debate

 

Sunscreen Showdown: Ghazal Alagh Accuses Lakmé of Product Imitation, Ignites Industry Debate

Mamaearth co-founder Ghazal Alagh recently stirred up controversy by calling out Lakmé for allegedly copying Mamaearth’s sunscreen stick product. This move has sparked debates across the skincare and FMCG sectors. As competition intensifies in India’s booming personal care market, this face-off is not just about two brands, but about ethics, innovation, and consumer trust.


In a development that has stirred the Indian skincare industry, Ghazal Alagh, co-founder of Honasa Consumer—the parent company of Mamaearth—has publicly accused Hindustan Unilever's Lakmé brand of imitating Mamaearth's sunscreen product. This allegation has sparked widespread discussions about innovation, intellectual property, and ethical practices within the beauty sector.

The Allegation

Alagh took to social media to express her concerns, highlighting striking similarities between Mamaearth's Aqua Glow Hydrating Sunscreen and Lakmé's newly launched sunscreen. She highlighted resemblances in product design, naming conventions, packaging aesthetics, and key ingredients. Alagh emphasized the extensive research and development that went into creating Mamaearth's product, suggesting that Lakmé's offering was a direct imitation.

Industry Reactions

The accusation has elicited varied responses from industry experts and consumers alike. Some have applauded Alagh for standing up against what they perceive as unethical practices by larger corporations. Others have called for a more nuanced understanding, noting that similarities in product features are not uncommon in the highly competitive skincare market.

Consumer Feedback

The controversy has also reignited discussions about product efficacy and customer satisfaction. While some users have voiced support for Mamaearth, citing positive experiences with its products, others have shared criticisms. For instance, a user named Aditi (@Sassy_Soul_) posted on social media, urging people to discard Mamaearth products, claiming ineffectiveness. Alagh responded to such criticisms by reaffirming her commitment to product quality and inviting direct feedback from consumers.

Regulatory Scrutiny

This incident comes at a time when Honasa Consumer is already under the scanner for advertising practices. The Advertising Standards Council of India (ASCI) reported that Honasa had the highest number of advertising violations in 2023, with 187 ads flagged for issues ranging from misleading claims to non-compliance with guidelines. Industry experts warn that repeated violations could erode consumer trust and brand credibility.

Legal Challenges Abroad

Adding to Honasa's challenges, a UAE court recently ordered the company to pay approximately Rs 57 crore in compensation to its former distributor, RSM General Trading LLC. The court found that Honasa had terminated the distributorship agreement without adhering to contractual obligations. Honasa has announced plans to appeal the decision, asserting that the court's order lacks merit.

Implications for the Industry

The public nature of Alagh's accusation against Lakmé underscores the growing tensions between emerging startups and established conglomerates in the beauty industry. It highlights the challenges startups face in protecting their innovations and the need for robust intellectual property safeguards. Moreover, the incident serves as a reminder of the importance of ethical practices and transparency in maintaining consumer trust.

Mamaearth co-founder Ghazal Alagh recently stirred up controversy by calling out Lakmé for allegedly copying Mamaearth’s sunscreen stick product — a move that has sparked debates across the skincare and FMCG sectors. As competition intensifies in India’s booming personal care market, this face-off is not just about two brands, but about ethics, innovation, and consumer trust.

 

🔥 Lakmé’s Threat Landscape: What’s at Stake?

Threat

Description

1. Brand Image Risk

Allegations may harm Lakmé’s reputation as an innovator.

2. Loss of Consumer Trust

Gen-Z and Millennials value originality and may boycott perceived copycats.

3. Legal Scrutiny

IP infringement claims could escalate if Mamaearth proceeds legally.

4. Social Media Backlash

Influencers and conscious buyers may side with Mamaearth.

5. Comparison Reviews

Online reviewers may now pit both products head-to-head, affecting Lakmé’s product ratings.

6. Innovation Reputation

May be viewed as follower, not leader.

7. Customer Migration

Mamaearth’s loyal base could grow as a result of this exposure.

8. Product Cannibalization

Similar products within Unilever’s portfolio (Lakmé parent) may compete internally.

9. Regulatory Audits

If claims prove strong, regulatory scrutiny may increase.

10. Influencer Detachment

Influencers may pull back from promoting Lakmé amidst controversy.

11. Sustainability Criticism

Mamaearth emphasizes natural, eco-friendly values, putting pressure on Lakmé.

12. Negative Press

Media coverage framing Lakmé as a copier can have long-term impact.

13. Decline in Shelf Priority

Retailers may prioritize Mamaearth for novelty appeal.

14. Investor Concern

Repeated accusations can concern institutional investors in Unilever.

15. Search Engine Decline

SEO metrics might fall as Mamaearth sees a spike.

16. Litigation Costs

Potential legal defenses can divert resources.

17. Consumer Lawsuits

Class-action or customer-driven complaints are a remote risk.

18. Supply Chain Redesign

If IP rules are tightened, Lakmé may need to rework packaging or formula.

19. Viral Content Impact

Viral memes or reels could reinforce a negative perception.

20. Brand Loyalty Shifts

Customers are increasingly switching to “conscious” brands like Mamaearth.

21. Retail Boycotts

Natural-focused retailers might pause stocking copycat products.

22. Disruption in New Launches

Launch plans for similar products may face delays or redesigns.

23. Global Scrutiny

As a Unilever brand, Lakmé might attract criticism in international markets.

24. Ethical Investor Pushback

ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) investors may scrutinize such practices.

25. Product Recall Risk

In case of regulatory pressure or public pushback, a recall might be demanded.


📊 Data Snapshot: Online Trends

Metric

Mamaearth Sunscreen Stick

Lakmé Sunscreen Stick (New)

Google Search Interest (March 2025)

85/100

34/100

Instagram Hashtag Mentions (Past Week)

#MamaearthSunscreen – 12k

#LakmeStickSunscreen – 2.1k

YouTube Reviews (Count)

230+

47

Customer Ratings on Amazon (Avg)

4.4

3.8

Price

₹599

₹499

 

🧠 Suggestions for Lakmé (Post-Crisis Strategy)

  1. Acknowledge Feedback Publicly.
  2. Launch a "Lakmé Innovates" campaign showing original R&D initiatives.
  3. Collaborate with Indian dermatologists for clinical validation.
  4. Highlight unique ingredients or texture differences.
  5. Offer limited-edition variants to stand out.
  6. Run a transparency report on product development.
  7. Launch an interactive poll with consumers on innovation ideas.
  8. Start a "Beauty Backed by Science" series on social media.
  9. Sponsor sustainability influencers to bridge the ethical image gap.
  10. Run a “Build Your Product” contest inviting Gen-Z inputs.
  11. Collaborate with AYUSH or local labs to promote local sourcing.
  12. Create a video showcasing Lakmé’s heritage and originality.
  13. Invite Ghazal Alagh for a public dialogue or roundtable.
  14. Introduce a QR code on products linking to full formulation story.
  15. Partner with tech startups for innovation acceleration.
  16. Use AR filters showing sunscreen stick effects for awareness.
  17. Launch a skin consultation app to differentiate digitally.
  18. Increase customer education about SPF and sun protection.
  19. Offer sunscreen combo packs with unique value add-ons.
  20. Work with colleges to encourage product design challenges.
  21. Share behind-the-scenes R&D labs via Insta reels.
  22. Create a Sunscreen Lab Pop-up Booth in malls.
  23. Emphasize cruelty-free, dermat-tested certifications.
  24. Launch a Lakmé Originality Pledge on World Creativity Day.
  25. Host a "What Makes Us Original" panel with experts and consumers.

 


Conclusion

 The public nature of Alagh's accusation against Lakmé underscores the growing tensions between emerging startups and established conglomerates in the beauty industry. It highlights the challenges startups face in protecting their innovations and the need for robust intellectual property safeguards. Moreover, the incident serves as a reminder of the importance of ethical practices and transparency in maintaining consumer trust. As the debate continues, it remains to be seen how Lakmé will respond to the allegations and whether this incident will prompt broader discussions about innovation and ethics in the skincare industry. For consumers, the controversy offers an opportunity to reflect on the values they prioritize when choosing products

References

  1. Ghazal Alagh’s statement on Instagram (March 2025) – original video & caption [@ghazalalagh]
  2. Google Trends Data – March–April 2025
  3. Amazon India – Customer Ratings (Sunscreen Stick Category)
  4. Instagram Hashtags – via Meta Tools for Business
  5. Mint, Business Standard & YourStory articles (March–April 2025)
  6. Mamaearth Official Website – https://mamaearth.in
  7. Lakmé Product Listings – https://lakmeindia.com

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Case Study Blog: Tata 1mg App- E-Pharmacy in India

  Case Study Blog: Tata 1mg App- E-Pharmacy in India Abstract: Tata 1mg, founded in 2015, is a pioneering e-pharmacy and health tech company in India. With its mission to make healthcare accessible and affordable, the platform provides medicines, diagnostic services, and telemedicine consultations. While its rapid growth and strategic partnerships have positioned it as a leader in the e-pharmacy sector, challenges such as reliance on commissions, regulatory hurdles, and logistics constraints remain. This case study explores Tata 1mg’s business model, challenges, performance over ten years, and strategies for sustained growth.   Introduction: Background of Tata 1mg Tata 1mg, formerly known as 1mg, is one of India's leading digital healthcare platforms. Established in 2015, the company provides a wide range of healthcare services, including online pharmacy, lab tests, doctor consultations, and health-related content. In 2021, Tata Digital acquired a majority stake i...

Case Study: The Impact of Advertising on Products with Special Reference to Fair & Lovely and Fair & Handsome

  Case Study: The Impact of Advertising on Products with Special Reference to Fair &  Lovely and Fair & Handsome Advertising is a powerful tool that shapes consumer perceptions, drives sales, and influences societal norms. This case study analyzes the impact of advertising on two well-known brands: Fair & Lovely (now Glow & Lovely) and Fair & Handsome. These fairness creams have been at the center of discussions about the ethical implications of advertising strategies, their effect on consumer behavior, and the evolving market landscape. Company Background Fair & Lovely Introduced in 1975 by Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL), Fair & Lovely became synonymous with fairness creams in India. Its advertising campaigns often emphasized fairness as a means to success, confidence, and social acceptance. Over the years, the brand has faced criticism for perpetuating colorism and underwent a significant rebranding to Glow & Lovely in 2020, shifting...

Case Study: Comparative Marketing Strategies of Relaxo, Bata, Liberty, and Their Brands

  Case Study: Comparative Marketing Strategies of Relaxo, Bata, Liberty, and Their Brands Abstract This study investigates the marketing, financial, pricing, and export strategies of three leading Indian footwear brands: Relaxo, Bata, and Liberty. It highlights how Relaxo’s focus on affordability and robust international presence contrasts with Bata’s premium positioning and Liberty’s emphasis on design-centric domestic growth. The analysis includes a comparative study of their market capitalization, return on equity (ROE), and promoter holdings, alongside a review of their export trends over the last five years. The findings underscore Relaxo’s consistent global growth and Bata’s challenges in recovering from market disruptions, while Liberty’s strategy revolves around domestic dominance with moderate export ambitions. The study provides actionable insights into how these brands can optimize their strategies to sustain growth and expand market share. The comparative framewor...